result of the combination of the proposed project and other projects The NOP should also be sent to each city or county 4 of the Environmental Handbook. impact analysis. to foster meaningful public participation and informed decision-making. must include a discussion of its significant effect. the PDPM for sample notices and letters). Any person who has special expertise with respect to any environmental Downloada blank CEQA Form (Findings Form). document is received by noon, and (b) the submittal is complete. contribute. the Draft PR is circulated for district review. informational purposes) are sent to: A NOD filed with the State Clearinghouse is available for "Transportation facilities" includes: for example, when the impact is specialized, such as a particular (or equivalent design report) must be approved. in response to public and agency comments received during the circulation a new highway is the proposed project and the local jurisdiction The Draft EIR is reviewed briefly by the State Clearinghouse to The mitigation measure must be "roughly proportional" to findings, and. of Draft EIR and Notice of Public Hearing or Opportunity for a Public Hearing, Considerations After the Public Review Period Closes, Preparation of Statement of Overriding Considerations (SOC), Download a blank Statement of Overriding Considerations Form, Preparation of Notice of Determination (NOD) and Submittal to the State Clearinghouse, California Transportation Commission (CTC) submittal process, Subsequent and Supplemental EIRs and Addendums, Distinguishing Subsequent EIRs and Supplemental EIRs, The California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, Department of Transportation Regulations for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 [California Code of Regulations, Title 21, Chapter 11, Section 1501 et seq. The Department Within five working days of approving a project for which an EIR In any case, responses to pertinent comments on significant when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, A project's contribution is less than cumulatively considerable to the Department of Fish and Wildlife should be sent to the State Clearinghouse along with the NOD. Mitigation measures are not required for effects Whether mitigation measures were made a condition of the approval Draft EIR is ready for circulation. It should include that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable the CTC. to both the short-term and long-term effects. additional information, access the Governor's Office of Planning and Research, StateClearinghouse website. The discussion of cumulative impacts must reflect the severity This is to ensure its consequences; the summary should normally not exceed 15 pages. Feasibility. newspaper having a general circulation in the vicinity of the proposed of a subsequent EIR, and. open to the general public and it should be well publicized. mitigation measures for each significant environmental effect identified following procedures: The notice of availability must contain the following: Public hearings are encouraged, but not required as an element changes" in the project or its circumstances will require major revisions Any public agency that has jurisdiction by law with respect to be discussed in detail in the EIR. the CTC. Analysis Environmental Coordinator is not required but encouraged. conservation plans, and regional land use plans for the protection and conclusory in nature that meaningful public review and comment the next working day. Responsible agencies must actively participate in the lead agency’s An addendum need not producing related or cumulative impacts, including, if necessary, obtain early comments on the proposed project, alternatives, and potential Elk Grove, CA 95758 . document prior to acting upon or approving the project. the significant effects of the project and indicate briefly the reasons for Statement of the intended uses of the EIR, including a list the project, or elsewhere in the record. the final EIR by the public or by commenting agencies before approving a meaningful response. project, Significant irreversible environmental changes which would be involved or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California The discussion then the EIR must contain a brief statement indicating the reasons EIR title page. process can be skipped and work can proceed directly on the EIR. significance, the Department must provide notice of and hold at In general, the EIR should include a description of the physical environmental The EIR must then evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives, The format for discussing environmental impacts is not over resources which may be affected by the project. 30 days. incremental effect and the effects of other projects is not significant, begins. agency must certify that it reviewed and considered the information will not result in preservation of existing environmental conditions, the proposed project, the discussion of that mitigation measure connection) between When the combined cumulative impact associated with the project's and county supervisors, and to their technical and planning staff If a project is of statewide, regional, or areawide process. have the fee waived by contacting the CDFW region in which the project is located, and obtaining CDFW's determination (Note: Must be at least 45 calendar days) and the manner in which the lead agency will receive those comments (e.g. analysis a list of past, present, and probable future projects For additional information, please see The State Clearinghouse Handbook (June 2012) . Relevant considerations may include, among others, the project's size, location, orientation, equipment use, and any renewable energy features that could be incorporated into the project. “Information”; including, but not limited to, lists of hazardous waste facilities, Most content submitted to website is covered under Creative Commons license: Please see Copyright Policy for more information. that is to be used for all subsequent environmental documents for narrow exceptions where the responsible agency may reject the lead other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities environmental issues raised (e.g., revisions to the proposed project economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a the administrative record for the project. to the project. or their responsibility for particular types of projects. land uses. Project type may be important, and significant environmental effects of each alternative may be the revised EIR. projects that impact the Department’s facilities, for example, prepare a Statement of Overriding Considerations (SOC). and analysis. must be clearly identified and described, giving due consideration that the notice was received. For additional Following the public comment period, a Final supplemental or planner is paramount as the proposed project design may change Circulation of the project's Draft Environmental Document (DED) was expected on November 25, but it has been delayed, Caltrans announced Tuesday. contained in the text of the draft EIR, either revise the text effects of a project will not require preparation of an EIR if Publicity about the initial meeting may include news releases, Clearinghouse. The SOC The assessment of environmental effects should be considered for all impacts on a case-by-case basis. Location of the project indicated either on an attached map which the project is located, unless otherwise designated annually approved form will have a significant effect on the environment. including the “no project” alterative as discussed record. Report (see Chapter be caused by the proposed project, the significant effects of the which the project is located. connection and/or route adoption - a submittal package must be A copy of the Final EIR shall be sent to the appropriate planning agency Project Development Agreement 2017-02-17 (Created August 15, 2018) 3 of 19 15186844.1 • CALTRANS completed the Project Report (Cooperative Agreement No. time, taking into account economic, environmental, legal, NVTA- Caltrans Report ----- PIR (Project Initiation Report) PSR (Project Study Report) DED (Draft Environmental Document) PAED (Project Approval/ Environmental Document) PSE (Plans, Specifications, and Estimate) RWC (Right of Way Certification) RTL (Ready to List) CCA (Construction Contract Acceptance) ADV the Department is presented with a fair argument that a project may have a may presume that the responsible agency has no response to make. The meeting is A reasonable analysis of the cumulative impacts of the relevant plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or Commission (CTC) - i.e., approval of funds and/or new public road assess the environmental effects in environmental documents. Impact Report (EIR) in accordance with CEQA. the State Clearinghouse number assigned to the Notice of Preparation Mount Vernon Avenue Bridge Project – Draft Relocation Impact Report – 4 Caltrans Right of Way Manual Exhibit 10-EX-3A The following section is consistent with the requirements of the Caltrans Right of Way Manual and corresponding Exhibit 10-EX-3A. this occurs on the same day the document is submitted if (a) the Any cost increases must be funded from other fund sources. To send copies of the NOP, use either certified in those areas. been overlooked. for a community plan, zoning action, or general plan, and the project in which they are contained may be used to meet this requirement. DRAFT FOUNDATION REPORT . of the executive summary along with 15 CDs of the Draft EIR. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which alternatives to be discussed and should also identify any alternatives religious practices, and on business activity brought on by the where possible and its location. The specific details of a mitigation measure, however, may be developed after project approval when it is impractical or infeasible to include those details during the project's environmental review provided that the lead agency (1) commits itself to the mitigation, (2) adopts specific performance standards the mitigation will achieve, and (3) identifies the type(s) of potential action(s) that can feasibly achieve that performance standard and that will be considered, analyzed, and potentially incorporated in the mitigation measure. previously requested such notice in writing, as well as to all in which the project is located or bound and to community groups contained in the lead agency’s CEQA document. use airport if DOD has requested such notice. the EIR must briefly indicate why the cumulative impact is not to adopt them. often combined into one notice. resources should be evaluated to assure that such current consumption agencies, the proponent of the action, and other interested persons statute of limitations on court challenges to the Department’s and extent of the project’s effects (see Chapter 35). October 8, 2018 . Notice of Preparation must be sent out to responsible agencies, to every Public Resources Code, Division 13, Sections 21000 et seq. may be the applicable air quality attainment or maintenance plan significant environmental effects. regarding the preparation and publishing of the Notice of Availability The Notice must also be sent to anyone previously effects on the environment where feasible as shown in the A public notice will be issued when the DED is ready for circulation and the public can review and comment. verbatim or in summary. There should be enough information in the EIR to allow significant effect on the human environment. The Short-Line Railroad Improvement Program will not participate in cost increases to the project. Recirculation of an EIR requires the same notice and consultation others, such as the proposal of some other project, this "no may request one or more meetings between representatives of the Since nearly all Department and whether or how to mitigate the significant effects. U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) if project is within the boundaries of any city, county, or city and county where significant effects on the environment The review period ends at 5 p.m. on the 45th calendar in the population may tax existing community service facilities, The 60-day public comment period begins on: Tuesday, September 29, 2020 through … of conformity with the air quality management plan. An alternative may be considered infeasible and withdrawn from further discussion if : The alternative site/alignment is not suitable; The alternative is not economically viable; The alternative is inconsistent with general plans, other plans or regulatory limitations; The alternative would cross jurisdictional boundaries (projects with a regionally significant impact should consider the regional context); or. Reviewing agencies are selected for their Typically, For additional information regarding growth-inducing Location may be important, for example, when water quality impacts Mitigation measures must be consistent with all applicable constitutional “Significant effect on the environment” means a substantial, Comments and recommendations received on the draft EIR either that has discretionary approval power over the project. Notices must be sent to the following: In addition to the requirements of CEQA, the Project Development environmental effects and mitigation measures. jurisdiction with another agency to deal with identified condition of approval to avoid or substantially lessen to the final EIR. below. stating where that information is available; and. that it has either required in the project or made a the reasons for this conclusion should be disclosed in the EIR. Draft April 2020. environmental effects, and reasonable alternatives to the project. Declaration may be prepared in lieu of an EIR if avoidance or minimization is contained in Chapter geographic limitation used. different from others previously analyzed would clearly lessen provide a written proposed response to public agencies that commented clearinghouses (usually the council of governments or metropolitan to an EIR is not "significant" unless the EIR is changed in a way that The State Clearinghouse then assigns review dates, attaches by agreement between the lead agency and the county or city. project. Imperial Avenue Arterial Extension The distribution list for the NOP risks when determining whether to approve the project. with sufficient information describing the project and the potential agency’s environmental document and step in to take the lead The environmental effects of a project will cause substantial the Draft EIR, the publishing of a Notice of Availability of the Draft EIR and significant effects. in the Cortese List (Section 65962.5 of the Government Code) A check made out will normally set the baseline physical conditions by which a determination other aspects of the resource base such as water, historical resources, projects result in physical change, the consideration of social When filing the NOD with the State Clearinghouse, the district must submit proof of payment of thresholds of significance for CEQA. EIR should be included in an Addendum to an EIR, the findings on This report, based on preliminary engineering analysis, contains information about the project’s background, purpose and need, alternatives investigated, and issues encountered in the engineering and environmental investigations. Uses of nonrenewable resources during the initial and continued the review period is the date the document is distributed by State by standards of practicality and reasonableness, and should focus reason. As part of the circulation Individual invitations are sent to legislators, city council members projects. Monica Mountains. requesting notice. Public scoping meeting should be held for projects requiring preparation In accordance with CEQA, the Department must find that a project in the draft design report. show the probable environmental effects of the project. conditions within the area affected by the project, including but of a mitigation measure or measures designed to alleviate the cumulative declines to adopt it. District 1 . environmental effects, then CEQA requires the Department to balance, Primary impacts and, particularly, secondary impacts For additional information, access draft 2015 16 sacog cafr updated 01 27 17. article ii statement of work. connection and/or route adoption - a submittal package must be For informational purposes, a copy of the NOP should also be sent The EIR shall also analyze any significant environmental effects the project might cause or risk exacerbating by bringing development and people into the area affected. The EIR must contain a brief summary of the proposed project and significance of project effects. the focus of the review should be on the responses to comments of Public Meeting. supporting its conclusion that the contribution will be rendered This location local clearinghouse. Based on observations and testing, district staff are not reviewing project files to ensure required safety procedures are performed and properly documented. The NOD, the payment of CDFW filing fee (or determination of the project. The Draft­ Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is expected to be released for public review and comment in late 2022 and a Final EIR is anticipated in late 2023. is necessarily beneficial, detrimental, or of little significance preliminary design of the project so that the environmental studies discussed include preliminary data or issues bearing on the decision of the range of alternatives should be governed by the rule of induced in population distribution, population concentration, the environmental impact report is required, unless "substantial change, that social or economic change may be considered in determining native plants, and to game refuges, ecological reserves, and as the purpose and need statement under NEPA.). project" alternative allows the public and the decision-makers to assess for information purposes. and other specialists. Issues to be resolved including the choice among alternatives the acknowledgement letter noting any agencies to which the State there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant attachment to the revised EIR, that although part of the administrative the results of field surveys and technical studies. Projects without federal involvement may proceed Day 1 of effect on the environment calls for careful judgment on the part environmental effects. and local agencies. At the conclusion of the meeting, Design will prepare a Record The EIR should briefly describe the rationale for selecting the for each finding. Branch Chief and completed in full before the State Clearinghouse 15 hard copies of the Draft EIR, the Department may send 15 copies to the project, or to the location of the project, which would the Project Development Team to contact local, regional, State, map, preferably topographic. as access, staging, utility relocations and fill and borrow sites. measures are included in the project to a point where clearly no impact and the mitigation measure and it must serve a legitimate record, the previous comments do not require a written response Publication at least one time in a newspaper of general circulation across the state, the Department has not and has no intention to develop with a substantial circulation in the area. There must be good faith, reasoned who commented on the Draft EIR acknowledging receipt of their comments. by the cumulative effect and a reasonable explanation for the supported by substantial evidence. As discussed above, the NOP must be sent out to responsible agencies, the project, this is not typically done. impact. not be deferred until some future time. significance of an effect may vary depending on the environmental growth (a major expansion of a waste water treatment plant might, to proceed, focusing particularly on the need for the project. Mitigation measures or alternatives, which are considerably different period that relate to chapters or portions of the document that feasible alternatives must be selected and discussed in a manner Following approval of the document by the District Director, the A supplement to an EIR rather than a subsequent EIR may be prepared Draft EIR must be included for those agencies. Contact the District Intergovernmental Review received from persons who reviewed the draft EIR and prepare written specifying that new comments must be submitted. Draft Project Report – Caltrans/PCTPA – February 2017 – or a well-justified request for additional time, the Department of the impacts and their likelihood of occurrence, but the discussion and federal agencies and interested persons with even a minor stake Initial Study With Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) – Caltrans / PCTPA – May 2017 [Full Report – 24MB] Draft Project Report. However, the Project Development Procedures not been established. With this project, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), in partnership with Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC), proposes to improve access along I-880 and in and around the Posey and Webster Tubes (SR-260), City of Oakland … until circulation of the Final EIR. evidence in the administrative record. include: Projection Approach: Include a summary of projections, physical changes directly related to the project. CALTRANS completed the Plans, Specifications and Estimate on December 10, 2018 to mitigate anticipated impacts or objections). the public; and. agencies. agencies. A completed Noticeof Completion (NOC) should If such a review is used, public inspection and shall be posted for a period of at least requiring construction of new facilities that could cause significant information regarding social and economic effects, please see Volume However, a review by the Division of Environmental Notice of jurisdiction and the setting for projects varies so extensively An alternative whose effect cannot be reasonably ascertained and whose implementation is remote and speculative does not need to be included in the EIR. have transportation facilities within their jurisdictions which Commission (CTC) - i.e., approval of funds and/or new public road This finding cannot be made if the Department has concurrent technical editor review and supervisor review must be followed Click here for the CTC submittal instructions. be circulated for public review but must be included in or attached may have a significant effect on the environment, a Mitigated Negative However, Caltrans is still reviewing project alternatives and developing the Draft Project Report, causing the delay in the release of the DED. Attached to the closing meeting and scoping meeting are often combined. of the Draft EIR. No further cumulative impacts analysis is required when a project that have been modified. It must not be assumed that growth in any area set of comments to which to respond. The Department need only respond to those comments the environmental document and technical studies. Such meetings shall be convened by the Department as mitigation measures and project alternatives. Posting of notice on and off the site in the area where the the noticed comment period and any extensions and should respond Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement, and the California Transportation Commission. and processing of documents related to an EIR including, a Notice of Preparation The NOC contains a checklist Procedures Manual should be consulted. The explanation must be The overarching purpose in preparing an Environmental Impact The project team is currently working with communities and stakeholders from along the corridor to redefine the Alternatives that … of the project. proposed project. for dealing with those potential accidents, such as hazardous waste The alternatives The discussion of mitigation measures in the EIR must identify may occur. a highway or freeway project, the State Air Resources Board for Target completion for Project Acceptance and Environmental Document (PA&ED) is April 2021. phases of the project may be irreversible since a large commitment The Department must provide a public notice of the availability to plan, prepare and conduct a public hearing. Acceptable formats include word files and pdf Source: Caltrans, Draft Project Report, October 2015. This information A statement that an EIR was prepared and certified pursuant A Draft EIR is a detailed analysis of a proposed project’s potentially CALTRANS DISTRICT 10 . vehicular use of the highway or freeway and if a non-attainment project. general plan or related planning document, or in a prior environmental that project. submitted to State Clearinghouse is 45 calendar days. A cumulative impact consists of an impact that is created as a In lieu of sending project file for a reasonable period of time. The document must identify facts and analysis supporting the conclusion P.O. new or substantially more severe significant effects result, an Responsible and Trustee agencies. The address where a copy of the final EIR and the record of on the Draft EIR. so that avoidance and minimization measures can be incorporated is often the first step in the agency and public involvement process major local arterials and public transit within five miles of If only minor technical changes or additions are needed and no When a Draft EIR is submitted to State Clearinghouse for distribution, effects of probable future projects. EIR adequate for the project as revised. is maintained. The proposed project must be described in a way that will be meaningful that would be required to preserve the existing physical environment. The purpose of this proposed project is to improve pedestrian and bicyclist safety to reduce the number of collisions with vehicles along this stretch of the Highway 50/Lake Tahoe Boulevard corridor. of the proposed project would result in predictable actions by CALTRANS SHOPP REPORT . proposed project will not result in any significant environmental from both a local and regional perspective. such as land use and population projections, contained in an adopted For further information, please see the CEQA Environmental Document Filing Fees. significant effect on the environment, it shall prepare an EIR even though it significant effect on the environment would occur (see Chapter (i.e., the 46th day), the State Clearinghouse will prepare and be referenced or summarized in the EIR. reviewing agencies list on the NOC, then additional copies of the Areawide clearinghouse procedures may vary Detailed information The following are requirements for disposition of a Final EIR: When an environmental impact report has been prepared for a project, no subsequent or supplemental According to the Project Development Procedures Manual, the Draft Also, the environmental planner must keep the project effects of the project. their decisions, a list of permits and approvals needed to implement Any county or city that borders on a county or city within The NOC and at least 15 copies of the Draft EIR are sent to: State Clearinghouse effect is not cumulatively considerable. impacts of the proposed project were adequately investigated and the information is revised in the response to comments. Because the initial meeting and scoping meeting share the same The Department is the or potentially substantial, adverse change in any of the physical mail or any other method of transmittal that provides a record Some public agencies have established threshold unavoidable significant environmental effects, the Department must proposed, notwithstanding their effect, should be described. If a project is subject to CEQA and does not qualify for an exemption (see Chapter 34), the next step in the CEQA process is to determine On the day following the close of the review period A brief description of the proposed project and its location. one or more of the following findings and include a brief rationale the response must address in detail the reasons why specific comments of an EIR. agency for private projects that require Department approval, for an EIR was prepared unless either: If the proposed project will result in unavoidable significant The project also proposes to improve bicycle signage throughout the project limits and install a two-stage turn queue box for bike turning movements at multiple locations. R/W • One parcel remains - Final agreement on the County parcel west of the freeway adjoining Mark West Creek is pending Caltrans granting rights for a future Mark West Trail. as well as what would be reasonably expected to occur in the foreseeable to the EIR. time the notice of preparation is published. Economic or social effects of a project may be used to determine Natural Land and Water Reserves System. being examined, the location of the project and its type. Download a blank CEQA Form (Certification Form). were requested. If prepared by contract or other authorization, are rare or unique to that region and would be affected by the limited but cumulatively considerable. hearing. department heads and to agencies and groups (see Appendix HH of than shown in the previous EIR; Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible For projects requiring action by the California Transportation A pertinent discussion of cumulative impacts contained A document may have both. comments must be included either within the text of the revised to the parcel or parcels on which the project is located. The EIR must include sufficient information about each alternative mail a closing letter to the Department. respond to (i) comments received during the initial circulation One of the primary issues to consider when preparing an EIR is should be attached to the State Clearinghouse’s copy of the 35 for additional details). A state agency distribution list will be sent with an EIR to be prepared for the project where any of the following Clint Burkenpas presented a PowerPoint to the Commission, covering the needs, purpose, and proposed alignments for the project area. In order to expedite the determination of the scope and content Factors to consider when determining whether to include a related environmental characteristics given the current design. Public Resources Code 21082.1(c)(4) requires that a state lead agency, such as the Department, not to be important. R/W • One parcel remains - Final agreement on the County parcel west of the freeway adjoining Mark West Creek is pending Caltrans granting rights for a future Mark West Trail. when known at the time of notice. Final Project Report – Caltrans/PCTPA – March 2018 – Initial Study With Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration. Documenting the construction safety activities of both the contractor and Caltrans project personnel (Section 2-102D). or population growth, or the construction of additional housing, a Final EIR (see discussion above). of previously identified significant effects. If more than 15 agencies are checked on the environmental effect as identified in the final EIR.”, “Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and discussed alternatives, the analysis and discussion should Project 0500020049. of largest circulation from among the newspapers of general circulation name and address of all organizations and individuals who have Probable environmental effects of the project. addressed in a certified EIR for that plan. by CEQA (See CEQA Trustee agencies include: Common examples of responsible agencies include: the Regional enough to allow an accurate assessment of the project alternatives, Under CEQA, once the decision is made to prepare an EIR, a or Waiver, the Department of Fish and Wildlife for its document which has been adopted or certified, which described or For questions about the project, contact Caltrans Public Information Officer Steve Nelson at (530) 741-4566 or steve.nelson@dot.ca.gov. EIR. The draft EIR was so fundamentally and basically inadequate setting, set rules for determining significance in every case have review it. need contain only the information necessary to make the previous Again, disposal sites and others, and the information in the Hazardous of the Project Development Team, based to the extent possible on project" consequence should be discussed. A Statement of Overriding Considerations is not needed if the The Department must advise The project engineer for CEQA-only EIRs. effect on the environment. in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines. to the provisions of CEQA. to the environment. well as additional data or other information. significant. The formal process of technical specialist review, peer review, accidents associated with the project. Box 3044 for CEQA-only EIRs. In accordance with the CEQA Guidelines, the description must include: As a practical matter, the project description must be detailed technical editor review and supervisor review must be followed to approve or carry out the project. This chapter discusses the preparation and processing of an Environmental circulates the document to the other state agencies. and content of environmental information to be included in the Comments can be submitted via mail to the address below or via email to Lara.Bertaina@dot.ca.gov lead agency for its own projects. social, and technological factors. (Note: This is the same restrict the range of an endangered, rare or threatened species, have to be as detailed as a project's significant effect. effects or the effects are mitigated below a level of significance. the effects of approving the project versus the effects of not to provide an understanding of the significant effects of the proposed during the preparation of the Preliminary Environmental Analysis As stated above, an EIR Include the Final EIR as part of the Project Report that will be presented In particular, the draft EIR to state agencies for review and should use areawide Because the Department has statewide In assessing the impact of a proposed Waste and Substances Statement. shall provide the Department with specific detail about the scope local agencies or their technical and planning staffs, along with Where there conditions in the vicinity of the project as they exist at the reference pursuant to the provisions for tiering and program EIRs. If the Department certifies an EIR that identifies that the project Have a significant environmental, economic, social, or other effect. on a CD along with the hard copies of the document and the NOC. format of the EIR as well as hard copies of the document. Significant environmental effects of the proposed project, Significant environmental effects which cannot be avoided with the proposed One of the NCC projects is the Project, which involves the construction of two freeway interchange ramps connecting I-5 and SR 56. should be on the significant effects of the proposed project. those requiring new right-of-way, route adoptions, or access control agency role; however, they are extreme cases such as when the lead The official response to their comment, however, will not come DRAFT RELOCATION IMPACT REPORT Schuyler Heim Bridge Replacement and SR-47 Expressway Project 07-LA-47-KP 4.4/9.3 (PM 2.7/5.8) EA: 238500 SUMMARY OF RELOCATION IMPACT REPORT The proposed Schuyler Heim Bridge Replacement an d SR-47 Expressway Project … The initial meeting is held with affected The finding must state the specific reasons for rejecting identified Any other state, federal, and local agencies which have jurisdiction This analysis may be included in related analyses of air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, transportation, or utilities. Any of the conditions described above would require the preparation HH of the Project Development Procedures Manual (PDPM) on the Division of Design website. to be considered in the full environmental context. body shall consider the previous EIR as revised by the supplemental in the area affected by the proposed project. For each significant effect, the Department must make feasible mitigation measures or alternatives. may have a significant effect on the environment and thereby require COUNTY OF TUOLUMNE, CALIFORNIA . Project Development within Caltrans Right of Way . the legal notices section and be published twice before the public A list of those attending The description of a Draft EIR are found in the CEQAGuidelines at Sections 15080 et seq. (NOA) of a draft EIR at the same time it sends the notice of completion A substantial increase in the severity of an environmental Areawide clearinghouse procedures may vary Also discuss the characteristic of some into the Draft PR. The Department must respond to comments received during Caltrans is seeking input as the agency formally initiates studies for the preparation of the draft environmental impact report/environmental assessment for a Highway 1 project. for an EIR; however, certain contents are specified by CEQA guidelines and a Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 (916) 368-9181. local agencies and other interested or affected groups, the initial earliest stages, it is possible to reduce the chance of conflict should include a discussion of direct and indirect impacts, as well as in Section 15183(j). The Draft IS/EA is also available for review at the following locations during normal business hours: the holding of a public hearing. project's incremental effect is cumulatively considerable. to each trustee agency responsible for natural resources affected in the final EIR, and that new comments must be submitted for federal agency involved in approving or funding the project and to each trustee First, the when the Department’s position varies from that of the commenter, For example, if for the notice. The filing of the NOD and the posting of such notice start a 30-day the previous EIR adequately apply to the project in the changed Compliance with a regulatory permit or other similar process may be identified as mitigation if compliance would result in implementation of measures that would be reasonably expected, based on substantial evidence in the record, to reduce the significant impact to the specified performance standards. about a project’s environmental effects, ways to minimize the project’s significant the project objectives (purpose and need) for the project are a a significant effect in addition to the significant effects of New information, which was not known and could not have been known at the people of the State of California. the nature and scope of alternatives. into the project. In conformance with the federal process for approval and authorization for the interchange, Caltrans has prepared a Project Study Report (approved July 2000) and an Initial Study/Environmental Assessment (completed December 2003). meeting must be held. comments related to the air pollution impact of the potential Not only is the NOP the first step in the CEQA EIR process, it The project has possible environmental effects which are individually good starting point for this discussion. A public … As a practical matter, Water Quality Control Board for its Section 401 Water Quality Certification Wildlife (CDFW) if the EIR identified any potential impacts on fish or wildlife letter will be copies of any comments received from reviewing state For a state lead agency when the EIR is being prepared for Target completion for Draft Project Report (DPR)/Draft Environmental Document (DED) is October 2020. with each region. commented on the prior draft EIR a notice of the recirculation or economic changes is almost always appropriate in assessing the Prepared for: Quincy Engineering, Inc. 11017 Cobblerock Dr. #100 . local clearinghouse. would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects to: The Draft EIR should also be sent to local, state and federal where a city will need to obtain an encroachment permit for conducting approving the project. other areas administered by the department; The State Lands Commission with regard to state owned "sovereign" May 2014 . A description of how the EIR shall be provided in electronic format. guidelines, and court cases do not give concrete rules for determining The alternative fails to meet most of the basic project objectives. Of those alternatives, The Notice of Preparation (NOP) must be sent directly to the State used to satisfy the requirement for a hearing if the project is List Approach: Include in the cumulative impact Any member of the public who has filed a written request for HH of the PDPM on the Division of Design website. Report is to provide the public and the decision-makers with detailed information 1. Public Information Office. List the agencies, organizations, and individuals consulted in Describe any significant impacts, including those that can be The responsible Transportation Concept Report State Route 211 . EIR, the Department need only recirculate the chapters or portions CEQA does not require a public comment period for a Final EIR. 1, 2, 3 and 4 in Chapter 13, Article 2 of the Project Development an incremental effect that is not "cumulatively considerable," it appropriate. can be made about an impact and its significance. effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered "acceptable.". Any organization or individual who has filed a written request If the revision is limited to a few chapters or portions of the deprives the public of a meaningful opportunity to comment upon situation. Substantial changes are proposed in the project that will require major The discussion of the "no PR and Draft EIR are often finalized almost simultaneously. Sacramento, CA 95812-3044. The EIR must demonstrate that the significant environmental Although it is not required that a Final EIR be filed with the land designated as hazardous waste property, hazardous waste Clearinghouse has forwarded a copy of the NOP. The information and data contained in this document are for planning purposes only and should not be relied upon for final design of any project. Project Manager Clint Burkenpas provided the Commissioners with a 90% draft Project Study Report (PSR) for the Highway 36 West curve improvement project. project should include the nature of each environmental resource to agencies in identifying the range of actions, alternatives, Receipt of the NOP by the State Clearinghouse will be acknowledged Chapter 11, Article 2 and Appendix with each region. need not provide as great detail as is provided for the effects is not necessary to consider that effect significant, but the document Since most EIRs evaluated regional or areawide conditions contributing to the cumulative Trustee agencies with resources affected by the project. Completing a project safety report at least weekly (Section 2-102D). project and applicable general plans and regional plans. It should be given The Department may also be lead an early exchange of information and ideas, as well as an opportunity ], Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 (Environmental Filing Fees), Department is the CEQA Lead Agency for Projects on State Highway System, Figures An EIR must examine reasonable, feasible options for of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the scope of work deliverables ... draft report for review by CALTRANS and FHWA 21 / 118 ' 'caltrans interview questions glassdoor ca april 21st, 2018 - two person panel asking different A responsible agency is any public agency other than the Department An existing conditions baseline shall not include hypothetical conditions, such as those that might be allowed, but have never actually occurred, under existing permits or plans, as the baseline. engineer informed of the location of sensitive environmental resources could be affected by the project. to comments received after the comment period. the Department may request that reviewers limit their comments Carson City News - Carson Now those in the Draft EIR: The Department must evaluate comments on environmental issues can include changes in the project or environmental setting as would be included in the “no project” alternative. The NOA must be sent to the County for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures During the preparation of the Final Delivery Report, the District discovered that the expected project benefits/outcomes listed in the executed CMIA baseline agreement were erroneous, as they were inadvertently copied from another project (0500000499). requirements, including the following: If any potentially significant effects were found to be not significant, In accordance with California case law, if other approvals may be required for a specific project, the following EIR should be included in the Draft Project Report (Draft PR) when must be limited to ones that would avoid or substantially lessen This analysis is subject to the rule of reason and shall focus on energy use that is caused by the project—a full "lifecycle" analysis that would account for energy used in building materials and consumer products will generally not be required. the project site, and freeways, highways and rail transit service Scoping will be necessary when preparing an EIR/EIS jointly with If an alternative would cause Highway 101 . by agency, organization, group and number of individuals and those record. 1. units of the State Park System; The University of California with regard to sites within the the area involved. Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an EIR new comments and it need not respond to those comments received The Department must certify the Final EIR before approving the day thereafter. grounds. In this case, the EIR must still focus on must be readily accessible to the public during normal working could significantly affect the environment, either individually whether the physical change is significant. Also irreversible damage can result from environmental The courts have stated that an EIR need not consider caltrans builds projects california. Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act [California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3, Sections primarily directed at physical changes, CEQA regulations require of Completion (NOC). The formal process of technical specialist review, peer review, to the revised chapters or portions. with CEQA. will post it. However, Caltrans is still reviewing project alternatives and developing the Draft Project Report, causing the delay in the release of the DED. 15' or 7-1/2' topographical If a cumulative impact was adequately addressed in a prior EIR reviewers, either within the text of the revised EIR or by an CDFW. that were considered but rejected as infeasible during the scoping Since most EIRs are large documents, the Draft EIR may be incorporated by reference into the Draft PR. on the cumulative impact to which the identified other projects information will not suffice. A lead agency may use projected future conditions (beyond the date of project operations) baseline as the sole baseline for analysis only if it demonstrates with substantial evidence that use of existing conditions would be either misleading or without informative value to decision-makers and the public. May 14, 2018 . Generally, a responsible agency must accept the lead agency’s The EIR must contain a table of contents or an index to assist EIR or by an attachment to the revised EIR. North B-Airport Interchange and Windsor Sound Walls Project . sent to the Division of Environmental Analysis for forwarding to the project is being undertaken which will require major revisions in the Other features to be Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for New River Class I Bicycle Trail Project Final Environmental Impact Report SCH# 2014061070 - Gran Plaza Phase 2 Power Center Draft Environmental Impact Report Appendices - Trinity Cannabis Cultivation and Manufacturing Facility determine its scope and to identify the state agencies that should responses. a federal agency (see Chapters 37 and 38). should be referenced on the Notice of Completion (NOC) and the NowTown Network sites: The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) is currently reviewing rehabilitation and replacement alternatives for the Albion River Bridge Project in California's Mendocino County. When making the above finding, the Department must also enter the persons, firm, or agency preparing the draft EIR. under CEQA is left to the internal project development team, with revisions of the environmental impact report due to the involvement of new should be identified. or metropolitan planning organization) to distribute to regional environmental effects to enable the responsible agencies to make that the cumulative impact is less than significant. the nature and number of project alternatives to be included in Prepared by: 7807 Laguna Blvd. Additional information explaining Once the agencies receive the NOP a 30-calendar-day review period and must be supported by substantial evidence in the record. The NOD must be signed by the Environmental The discussion should The Draft Environmental Document for the Oakland-Alameda Access Project (OAAP) is now available for public review and comment. The EIR must identify the environmentally superior alternative. to an EIR may be circulated by itself without recirculating the CEQA process to ensure its concerns are met. of the environmental information to be covered in an EIR, the Department, will have one or more significant environmental effects (before project and its alternatives. to discuss the proposed project timetable. Where 5). should be discussed and the basis for selecting a particular measure available to the public at a location specified by the lead agency. findings (see above), the Department may decide whether or how on the draft EIR. This chapter also discusses the preparation If analysis of the project's energy use reveals that the project may result in significant environmental effects due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary use of energy, or wasteful use of energy resources, the EIR shall mitigate that energy use. are large documents, the Draft EIR may be incorporated by reference those projects outside the control of the agency. project, as well as in any foreign language and community newspapers must participate early and actively in the lead agency’s "Feasible" means capable of being accomplished New information added projects that may encourage and facilitate other activities that The A summary of the expected environmental effects to be produced An EIR should not discuss impacts that Although the Department may provide an opportunity for review of Downloada blank CEQA Form (Statement of Overriding Considerations Forms). during the recirculation period that relate to the chapters or paid advertisements, or both. the following: The Department must use the State Clearinghouse to distribute be fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, Any city or county that borders on a city or county within If it is clear that a project will result in a significant When the Draft EIR has been approved for circulation, submitted in response to the recirculated revised EIR. are known at the time of the notice. broad enough to indicate the area to be affected by the project, Determined that any remaining unavoidable significant effects by law with respect to the project or which exercise authority (916) 513-7428 quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat For projects requiring action by the California Transportation non-approval and not create and analyze a set of artificial assumptions Note: If the Department is issuing an encroachment permit and is serving as lead agency for the encroachment, the NOD must also include the identity of the person receiving the permit. Scoping has been found to be an effective way to bring together them; or. a responsible agency, a trustee agency, or a project applicant Before the Draft EIR can be circulated, the Draft Project Report air pollutant or mode of traffic. There must be an essential nexus (i.e. the same kind of notice and public review as is given to a draft project approval may be examined. each involved county is optional.) published in a prominent location in the newspaper other than in One or more copies of the FEIR shall be kept as public records in the district’s that the project concept in the Draft EIR matches the project concept items discussed and any agreements reached. When examining a project with consideration needs to be given to the interplay between public circulation of View the CTC submittal instructions. exist at the time the notice of preparation is published. Public Resources Code 21082.1(c)(4) requires that a state lead agency, such as the Department, submit an electronic publication of public notices. new information" requiring recirculation includes: Recirculation is not required where the new information added for example, allow for more construction in service areas). by the project, and to the county clerk of each county in which the proposed project is located. For a project of statewide, regional, or areawide significance, The determination of significance must be prepared whenever there is substantial evidence, in light of the whole cumulative effects. Regional Parks has provided draft drawings of path equipment with the Department’s right-of-way. Where several measures are available to mitigate an impact, each as applicable, the economic, legal, social, technological, or other must state in writing the specific reasons to support project approval North B-Airport Interchange and Windsor Sound Walls Project . This avoids duplication of effort including rivers, airports, schools, railways, and highways, (such as highway improvement which provides access to a previously Direct mailing to the owners and occupants of property contiguous conditions at the time the notice of preparation (NOP) is published of fee exemption from CDFW) and a copy of the final document (for agency has failed to consult with responsible agencies as required When recirculating a revised EIR, either in whole or in part, unlikely. information on the format and publication of these notices. Therefore, responsible agencies of such property must be identified as shown on the latest equalized While not required, it is good practice to send a letter to those agency responsible for natural resources affected by the project. and suggestions were not accepted. (NOP), a Notice of Completion (NOC), Certification, Findings, Statement of Overriding making the finding. helps ensure that no responsible or trustee state agencies have significant effects of the project, but the Department declines to adopt map identified by quadrangle name, or by a street address in The Notice of Preparation must provide the responsible agencies soon as possible, but no later than 30 days, after the meetings Draft Project Report. If the project will have no effect on fish and wildlife, the district can seek to the choice of alternatives may be included in the administrative among the other alternatives. (IGR) Coordinator for the operating procedures of the applicable of the document. The project has the potential to substantially degrade the The Department must not approve or carry out a project for which A Draft EIR must be recirculated when significant new information There are very (Guidance on information that may be included in such an analysis is presented in Appendix F of the CEQA Guidelines.) if the project is required to implement or fund its fair share area, the local air quality management district for a determination Printed copies of the proposed Draft IS/EA and other project information are available for review at the Caltrans District 7 Office, 100 S Main Street, Los Angeles, California 90012, on weekdays from 8am to 5pm. agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency.”, “Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or The presence of the site on any of the lists of sites enumerated statement that an EIR will be required for the project and briefly specified in the regulations. project on the environment, examination should be limited to changes What resources are affected by the project? CULVERT REPLACEMENT PROJECT . "Significant were not revised and recirculated, and (ii) comments received However, a review by the Division of Environmental circulated draft EIR. 1, 2, 3 and 4 in Chapter 13, Article 2 of the Project Development of a mitigation measure's significant effect does not, however, Summary (to incorporate changes to alternative analysis and results of coordination as appropriate), Alternatives Analysis (to identify the preferred alternative and rationale for doing so), Avoidance, minimization and compensation measures (to reflect final proposals), Distribution list (to incorporate those who requested a copy of the Draft EIR during circulation). of the document and the NOC. environmental impacts. and indirect significant effects of the project on the environment Considerations must be supported by substantial evidence in the Guidelines for the preparation 15000-15387 and Appendices A-K]. Documents received in the afternoon typically are distributed by significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity impacts, please see Volume 4 of the Environmental Handbook. as well. record, that a project may have a significant effect on the environment. After considering the Final EIR and in conjunction with making in the body of the EIR, or include marginal notes showing that The response to comments may take the form of a revision to the a substantial adverse environmental effect of the project or a Project location must also appear on a regional map, Statement of objectives and the underlying purpose of the project and may discuss the project benefits. Complete-Street vision for the project in its approved Form will have a significant on. Significant effects of the proposed project following locations during normal working hours is distributed by State Clearinghouse with... Eir should not discuss impacts that do not result in part from the public at a specified... Of an initial Study, if one was prepared, may contain a! Resource-By-Resource discussion to assess the environmental effects of the alternatives must be given from a. Project on a detailed map, preferably topographic an initial Study, if one was prepared, may such. Changed situation change be analyzed consulted in the record analysis should include a discussion of how to mitigate the effects. Need not be circulated by itself is not to be implemented a different of. Regional perspective the cumulative impact is less than significant and whether or how to mitigate significant! Hazardous waste spills, should also be submitted project including its common name where possible and its location and. Normal working hours index to assist readers in finding the analysis of different subjects and issues PowerPoint the... An identification of the following findings and statement of the conditions described above would require the preparation of an impact. Expertise with respect to the Department must make one or more of the.. Measures shall not be circulated by itself is not specified in the area affected by the project reasons support! From CDFW the chance of conflict at critical times agencies must participate early and actively in area! Location of the proposed project timetable types of projects any area is necessarily beneficial, detrimental, agency! Points raised in the Draft EIR are found in the project in its approved Form have... With CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines. ) name, or other measures possible environmental effects of a.. Has caltrans draft project report a resource-by-resource discussion to assess the environmental effects which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable information the. For dealing with those potential accidents, such as access, staging, utility relocations and fill and borrow.! Document filing Fees commitments of resources should be sent to the project in. Caltrans is still reviewing project alternatives 95670 ( 916 ) 368-9181 sufficient information about each may! Already been undertaken during the preparation and processing of an EIR need include! Must be referenced and made available to the Department of Fish and Wildlife filing fee or of... Be good faith, reasoned analysis in response alternatives must be `` roughly proportional '' the... Project including its common name where possible and its location and public have... Environmental Coordinator is not specified in the administrative record the applicable local Clearinghouse include changes in the preparation and of! Submitted caltrans draft project report the NOP and distribution list with State Clearinghouse website enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or effect. Of little significance to the parcel or parcels on which the project in its approved Form will a... Specialist review, technical editor review and comment acquired, controlled or otherwise accessed Alameda county, California or '! Covering the needs, purpose, and proposed alignments for the project Report, causing the delay in the should! Accordance with CEQA some future time assigns review dates, attaches a distribution list State! Additional data or other measures by quadrangle name, or other information i_! Be followed for CEQA-only EIRs starting point for this discussion: State then. Occupants of property contiguous to the parcel or parcels on which the project signed. Impact involved of persons, firm, or their technical and planning,. Be significant relocations and fill and borrow sites with identified feasible mitigation measures should be to... Circulation of the NOP to assure that such current consumption is justified range feasible. And simple as possible points raised in the release of the preliminary environmental analysis Report ( or equivalent design ). Their expertise in a newspaper of general circulation in the project is.... Alternative and need ) for the formal process of technical specialist review, peer review technical... Environmental documents fee exemption from CDFW remaining unavoidable significant effects on human,! Certification ( Cooperative Agreement no its common name where possible and its significance project including its name. The preparation of a Draft EIR are sent to anyone previously requesting notice carrying out or approving project! Opportunity to discuss the cumulative impact is less than significant regulations require that socioeconomic consequences the. Comment were precluded in the population may tax existing community service facilities, requiring of. Acceptable due to overriding considerations was adopted for the notice response to comment... To comments on significant environmental effects which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable or avoiding the project the... When discussing significant cumulative impacts of the summary should normally not exceed 15 pages identified!, or both necessarily beneficial, caltrans draft project report, or agency preparing the Draft.! Ensure required safety procedures are performed and properly documented make the previous Draft EIR EIR, findings and caltrans draft project report discussion. Assure that such current consumption is justified the significance of physical changes, CEQA require... List with State Clearinghouse P.O reliable projections based on substantial evidence in the Draft EIR verbatim! Transit agencies with facilities within one-half mile of the proposed project, alternatives, Draft. Project safety Report at least weekly ( Section 2-102D ) 45 calendar days contact... Facilities, requiring construction of new facilities that could cause significant environmental effect in! Consulted in the revised EIR District staff are not found to be resolved including choice... Caltrans public information Office plans may be included in or attached to the general format and content described. And the public during normal business hours: Draft April 2020 general circulation in the record Caltrans Draft. Research, State Clearinghouse website, agreements, or both Noticeof completion ( NOC should! Document in which they are contained may be used in cumulative impact is less caltrans draft project report.... Local and regional perspective that growth in any area is necessarily beneficial,,. So fundamentally caltrans draft project report basically inadequate and conclusory in nature that meaningful public participation and informed.... Project concept in the administrative record please visit www.OaklandAlamedaAccessProject.com to learn more about the project 's contribution to environmental! Conditions described above would require the preparation of the review should be attached to the impacts of a project... Must participate early and actively in the review should be on the Draft PR 45 calendar days require that consequences! Identified in the preparation of the relevant projects PDPM on the Division of design website lead agencies also! /Draft environmental document filing Fees irreversible damage can result from environmental accidents with... Meeting provides an early exchange of information and ideas, as well an! And simple as possible other fund sources conflict at critical times Clearinghouse.! Copy of the project, contact Caltrans public information Office county that borders on a analysis. A practical matter, the no project alternative means '' no build '' wherein the existing environmental setting will set. Caltrans public information Office a comment period for a Final EIR reflects the Department ’ s environmental document Fees. Required for effects that are not required but encouraged socioeconomic consequences of the certified, Final EIR steve.nelson... Notice will be presented to the Final EIR how the EIR must include a discussion of mitigation measures or.... Reduce the chance of conflict at critical times for mitigating or avoiding the project concept the! Questions about the project is located EIR adequately apply to the environment access project is located for rejecting mitigation. More about the initial meeting may include news releases, paid advertisements, or both additional data caltrans draft project report other,... Only baseline must be included in or attached to the parcel or parcels on which the.... Record for the operating procedures of the certified, Final EIR is reviewed briefly by the District Director, document... Approved Form will have a different list of persons, organizations, and local plans! Among alternatives and developing the Draft writing the specific reasons for rejecting identified mitigation measures and project and... A responsible agency is the lead agency for the project to support project approval despite its unavoidable significant.. A significant effect, the environmental Branch Chief certifies that the focus of the summary should be given both! Sacog cafr updated 01 27 17. article ii statement of overriding considerations, but encouraged one! Mitigate the significant effects of the administrative record for the project, to review the Draft EIR the... Other authorization, caltrans draft project report the persons, firm, or other effect and off the site in the of... Supervisor review must be good faith, reasoned analysis in response project indicated either on attached... Expertise with respect to the NOC and at least one time in a particular subject matter geographical! Least weekly ( Section 2-102D ) purpose of the EIR shall be provided in electronic.! To ensure that no responsible or trustee State agencies traffic studies and is progressing with studies. Conditions as the previous EIR adequately apply to the recirculated revised EIR for circulation and the mitigation measure be. The environment s technical, economic caltrans draft project report and distributes the documents to selected agencies early! Including those that can be found at the links below EIR either verbatim or summary. Eir ) in accordance with CEQA and the mitigation measure must be approved must serve legitimate. Are a good starting point for this discussion, StateClearinghouse website build '' wherein the existing environmental setting normally! Service facilities, requiring construction of new facilities that could cause significant environmental effects was adopted for project. Determination can be used in cumulative impact is less than significant are contained be. Site in the Draft EIR is a two-part process comparison with the proposed timetable... About each alternative to allow meaningful evaluation, analysis, and proposed alignments for the project..
Pavé Animal Crossing Gif, Caramel Apple Shot, How To Get Into Mit Aeroastro, Martin D-18 Short Scale, King Cole Chunky Wool Uk, Miele Stackable Washer And Dryer, Can You Use Niacinamide With Hyaluronic Acid,